Hello, On 28 Sep 2007, at 05:57, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> Perhaps if you shared fftw_plan across all objects that use the > same block size, you'd save clicks? Perhaps that just loading the > fftw class that you are using could prepare plans for several > common block sizes? For example every power-of-two from 64 to 4096. Ok that sounds like the right magic; thank you! >> and that we could rather use an FFT library that is more DSP chain >> friendly. I assume Miller's choice of Ooura has to do with that? > > I doubt that Miller tried FFTW3...? Miller? David _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
