On 04/10/2007, at 5:37 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > chris clepper wrote: >> I uncommented it which is the correct behavior compared to the >> original recordQT object. > > i don't know why it has been removed. > however, why don't we just use a separate outlet (or a different > message) to indicate the end of recording? > i am not a very big fan of ambigous messages...
I do not think that the frameNumber 0 is an ambiguous message in this case. However I think that an output telling us the state of the object might be useful. But perhaps it is just an over-featuring. chrz, tim _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
