On Oct 29, 2007, at 4:23 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> If you had class_getclassname(), then it would be used in the >> existing savefn API, in the binbuf_addv(). I don't know enough to >> say how useful your proposal would be. > > obviously it would work with the current savefn API. > it already does so, even without the class_getclassname(). > > i am rather thinking of an API that does not require you to think > with a knot in your head. > (for me the binbuf-shit is the weird stuff, not how to get the > classname) > > and even if (or somebody else) would think of a very nice api for > savefn, i would prefer to have to old one lying still around, as > you can do weird (and great) things with it, which you couldn't do > with a simple wrapper api.
I am all for adding an easier API, sounds like a worthwhile project. .hc ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- Access to computers should be unlimited and total. - the hacker ethic _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
