On Nov 10, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Frank Barknecht wrote: > Hallo, > Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > >> On Nov 10, 2007, at 7:45 AM, Andy Farnell wrote: >>> >>> This sounds interesting Hans. The question would be, what >>> is the default/empty behaviour of Pd with no internals at all? >>> >>> Does it just become a framework for connecting objects (the Pd way)? >> >> Yeah, pretty much. It leads to the question, what are Pd's >> essential "reserved words"? > > I consider the objects currently in Pd-core the essential ones, if > alone for practical reasons. But also technically they are a good base > selection.
Reserved words are different than essential functions. Here are the C reserved words: http://lib.daemon.am/Books/C/apb/apb.htm Try to write Pd without calloc, sprintf, etc. yet they are not reserved words. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserved_word .hc ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- "Free software means you control what your computer does. Non-free software means someone else controls that, and to some extent controls you." - Richard M. Stallman _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
