Hallo, Martin Peach hat gesagt: // Martin Peach wrote: > I use pd-extended and I think it would be a lot easier to use if > _everything_ was in flatspace so I don't have to rewrite all my objects > with the directory prefix and manually track down the help files. For > example all the stuff in mrpeach could just as easily be in flatspace > since none of it depends on anything else, there is no library file they > all need except for pd itself. If any name conflicts arise I would just > rename the offending objects.
That actually was the approach of the original, pre-pd-extened build system in the CVS: Instead of including all versions of an objectclass name, only one would be chosen to be included in the build system and in releases. Pd-extended instead opted to use a build and packaging system that could include all versions of, say, [gate] , but put them in different subdirectories. The side effect is that now everything is in subdirectories and it's hard to tell, which [gate] you mean if you just write [gate]. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__ _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
