Since DD is a fork, I think it should not be a branch of Pd in the repository. It can be in the same repository, I don't care either way about that. I think IOhannes proposed something like this (but maybe something else makes more sense?):
abstractions doc pd externals desiredata I expected they would have wanted their own repository so that they can control it themselves without having to deal with the Pd overhead (adding devs, commit policy, etc). But I guess not. .hc On Feb 6, 2008, at 9:08 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > > Dear pd-dev, > > Should DesireData remain part of the "pure-data" sf-project, or > become a separate sf-project just like GEM already is?... > > I ask because HCS seems quite concerned by the thought that > DesireData might stay in the repository. He seems to claim that > moving DesireData out of the repository, would be a way of > collaborating with him. > > What do you think? > > _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... > | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC > Canada_______________________________________________ > PD-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- 'You people have such restrictive dress for women,’ she said, hobbling away in three inch heels and panty hose to finish out another pink-collar temp pool day. - “Hijab Scene #2", by Mohja Kahf _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
