Hi, On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 19:26 +0100, Georg Holzmann wrote:
> For me, as I am interested in DSP and similar things, it would be also > nice to additionally add new or other MIR/feature extraction algorithms. > However, I think that it would be better to add such algorithms to > libxtract or any other vamp plugin collection, then also other projects > would benefit from it. I completely agree with that. This was my original motivation for writing libxtract as a C library rather than a set of Pd objects. > But on the other hand this wouldn't be a pd-only project, so I don't > know if it is suited for the GSoC program ... but in the end they would > be also available in pd - through the VAMP plugin host external ;) Yes, it would be great if some improvements got made to libxtract as a 'side effect' of the Pd GSoC! Something that might be interesting would be a set of MIR-inspired abstractions that use the libxtract/aubio bindings + the Pd machine learning objects ([knn], [ann_mlp], [ann_som]) to do common tasks - e.g. speech recognition, audio segmentation with labelling etc. A kind of Pd MIR toolkit. Jamie -- www.postlude.co.uk _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
