Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > Hey, > > http://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pure-data/tags/pd/ > > I just added tags for 0.41.0 thru 0.41.2. Those tags for 'pd' are a > bit of a mess, so I would like to propose cleaning them up. First, I > think we can ditch the 'pd-' prefix since they are already in a
i agree. > folder called 'pd'. Second, I think we should use the very standard > '.' as the separator between numbers. hmm, miller's versioning scheme has been consistent since (i think at least) pd-0.34-0 so i don't see a reason to change branch-names to just another standard just because we can. instead i think branch/tag-names of Pd should follow the versioning scheme of Pd as closely as possible. > > - I think we should probably also clean up the "pd-0.39-3", > "pd-0.39-3-again", "pd-0.39-3-oncemore", , "pd-0.39-3-really" to be > just the right 0.39.3. hmm, i don't know why these branches are named like that. one could argue that the person who created them did so on purpose (though probably not) > - do we need the test versions listed in the tags? There are only a > couple existing anyway. again, as these branches had been created, why should we not need them? fgmadsr. IOhannes _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
