On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 3:13 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: >> IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: >>> #define STRING_ATOMID=666 >> >> and while we are at it: i hereby want to claim the atomID "75" for >> FTMobjects [1]. >> please do not use this atomID, if you are not wrapping FTMobjects within >> such atom. > > additionally, i want to claim atomID "77" for FTMstrings (which are part > of ftm, but since i have never used them before, i plainly forgot about > them; i also cannot answer any questions on how they actually work and > whether they might be compatible with mrpeach's strings)
also, i'd just like to add, that i think the 666 atomID should be reserved for 'evil' data. It could be useful in the future for optimized implementations of evil processing routines. thanks, Steve _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
