Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > On May 28, 2008, at 1:28 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > > I think you can guess which one I think is good ;) the multi- > objectclass library file format seems to cause a lot more problems > than it solves.
the key is: have your own opinion, but allow a variety of opinions... > > We could also switch to gcc on Windows, then we wouldn't have to work > about M$VC oddness, unless someone really wants to. gcc was been > building Pd-extended for years now. again, the key is: have your own opinion, but allow a variety of opinions... why should i not use a commercial compiler if it produces better code, e.g. icc (i don't say that M$VC produces better code) apart from that, the same thing is also possible with M$VC, you just have to specify it differently. i think it is via _DLL_InitTerm() or the like. the "__attribute__ ((constructor))" is really a gcc extension. it should not be used in platform independent code... > > Sure, makes sense to be system-wide. I don't really have a good > grasp on the implementation details, how hard would it be to add this > to Pd? within Pd it should be a couple of lines. in an external loader it would be a couple of more lines (as we have to find and open the library again) plus the glue. nfvasdr IOhannes _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
