IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > > hmm, thanks for bringing this up. > i can reproduce the problem here, BUT: > i reverted my patch (it is really just modifiying 3 lines and deleting > another 3) and recompiled. > this is what i get: > tried /tmp/pdx/20080619/usr/bin/iemlib/any.l_i386 and failed > tried /tmp/pdx/20080619/usr/lib/pd/extra/iemlib/any.l_i386 and failed > tried /tmp/pdx/20080619/usr/bin/iemlib/any.pd_linux and failed > tried /tmp/pdx/20080619/usr/lib/pd/extra/iemlib/any.pd_linux and > succeeded > iemlib/any > ... couldn't create > > AFTER this is can create [any] just fine (but still no [iemlib/any])
furthermore when try it with a vanilla Pd-0.41-1 binary, i get: tried /tmp/pdx/20080619/usr/bin/iemlib/any.l_i386 and failed tried /tmp/pdx/20080619/usr/lib/pd/extra/iemlib/any.l_i386 and failed tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/iemlib/any.l_i386 and failed tried /tmp/pdx/20080619/usr/bin/iemlib/any.pd_linux and failed tried /tmp/pdx/20080619/usr/lib/pd/extra/iemlib/any.pd_linux and succeeded iemlib/any ... couldn't create looks kind of similar, ey? (any yes: i now can create [any] just fine (but still no [iemlib/any])) so i guess that it is not my hexloader-fix that causes the trouble here, but rather the any.pd_linux fgmasdr IOhannes _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
