On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 19:24 -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > > anyway, it seems that it has been years ago, so nevermind. i was > > confused when trying to help someone with a patch, that uses [range], > > which i found in /deprecated (this person was using pd-0.38.4-extended, > > irrc). obviously, i had to think, that the original libraries were split > > and parts of them were arbitrarily moved around. > > So, should I rename GridFlow's [range] to something else, or not?
sorry for late reply. i couldn't figure out, what [range] from gridflow does, so it makes you difficult to have an opinion about this. the fact, that it doesn't have a '#' in its name, makes me assume, that it does something, that cannot only be applied to grids, which means, it has kind of a general use. this speaks for keeping the name. on the other hand, i find it problematic, if libraries with a dedicated focus (processing grids in the case of gridflow) include classes, that aren't really part of that focus AND at the same time occupy a generic name. roman ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev