On Jul 8, 2008, at 3:25 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > >>> Since then I realised that svn:externals is indeed a not-so-good >>> idea. Today I removed my svn:externals link and switched to a >>> regular copy using svn import. >> could you elaborate on why you now find that svn:externals are a >> not-so-good idea? > > Because what if someone wants to make a branch out of all of the > stuff in pd/externals ... then pd/externals/gridflow won't be > branched, and that person won't be able to patch it. Well, there > are already branches like that, and the same applies to tags. I > thought that this is what Hans wanted me to understand but he > didn't explain it. In any case, this is what I eventually > understood from his original comment on svn:externals.
That's a good reason, but I didn't realize it before. Thanks for pointing it out. Also, using svn:externals means that to do operations on source, all of the repositories have to be working fine in order for it to work. For example, on svn:externals link had a invalid certificate, causing an error which broke the auto-build. Ok, so you can accept the cert permanently. But since it was a self- generated cert, there is a good chance of it being regenerated. This adds a source of problems without a whole lot of benefit, IMHO. .hc ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- There is no way to peace, peace is the way. -A.J. Muste _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
