On Dec 1, 2008, at 2:49 PM, Miller Puckette wrote: > Good idea... but unfortunately it generalizes to any object that > has an > 'anything' method plus other specific ones, so if I started doing this > I wouldn't know where to stop!
Sounds good to me. :) I prefer inlets over custom message selectors when possible. I think they are cleaner and easier to use. > BTW, the help window doesn't make it clear, but the main reason for > having > stdout is for use with pd~. Ah, that makes sense. On that note, a [pdwindow] or [console] object for getting the data from the Pd window would be quite handy. .hc > > cheers > Miller > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 08:11:02PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner > wrote: >> >> Hey, >> >> I just checked out [stdout] in pd 0.42 in extra, looks like a handy >> object. One comment, what about adding a second inlet that you can >> bang for the flush? This would be instead of the "flush" message. >> Then the first inlet can always just be passed straight through to >> stdout. >> >> .hc >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> --- >> ---- >> >> The arc of history bends towards justice. - Dr. Martin Luther >> King, Jr. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pd-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is related to the telescope. -Edsger Dykstra _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
