Hi there: Hans-Christoph Steiner said : > > Here's how I see it: I think we should first reorganize the code and > streamline the GUI. I think we can change things that are only in the > current u_main.tk. Then once that is complete, we can start making more > substantial changes. So things like updating the preference pane GUIs > (Path, Startup, Audio, Midi), reorganizing the key bindings and menus, > cleaning up the Pd window and Help Browser, etc. > > What in particular did you have in mind?
what i meant is more like this: patch only makes sense (in my head) when diffing between two similar files, or files derived from one and another. starting with a new file might be difficult for the main branch to eventually include it. hope this makes sense. I am happy with either way, i am just mentioning this because if we are thinking of having the main branch graudally take up the changes in pd-devel, then we need to think about how best for the changes to be ingetrated. cheers chun > > .hc > > On Dec 25, 2008, at 8:11 AM, [*~] wrote: > >> Hi all: >> >> One question just occured to me on starting with a minimal pd.tk in >> the new pd-devel is that, how would we then make incremental patches >> againest the main branch? i seem to remember incremental changes was in >> discussion in previous thread on pd-devel. >> >> cheers >> >> chun >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pd-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ---- > > Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to > realize his wishes. Now that he can realize them, he must either change > them, or perish. -William Carlos Williams > > > _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
