IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> This looks very cool, we need an easy to use OSC replacement for >> dumpOSC/sendOSC. One thing, I get this when I load them: >> >> unpackOSCstream >> ... couldn't create >> unpackOSCstream >> ... couldn't create >> packOSCstream >> ... couldn't create >> packOSCstream >> ... couldn't create > > > afaik, they are in mrpeach/osc (as has been discussed on some list: the > problem with tcp/ip as a transport of OSC being a stream-based protocol > rather than packet-based)
They are there in svn at least. I just committed the tcpsocketserver abstractions in the same place. I haven't had time to test them though... Martin _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
