Oops... I'd better fix that one. I'm still not sure how to deal with "declares" inside abstractions, on the other hand.
cheers Miller On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 05:39:34PM -0800, Luke Iannini wrote: > Yo, I've been meaning to mention forever that there's a similar issue > with datastructures. Save a datastructure-using patch as an > abstraction, instantiate it in a parent patch, save the parent, and > you'll see template definitions from the child abstraction in the > parent. I'll make another bug report for that... > > Best > Luke > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Roman Haefeli <reduzie...@yahoo.de> wrote: > > hi everyone > > > > i once posted a bug to the tracker and it still appears to be there in > > version 0.42.3. > > > > since this bug is kind of viral, so that it corrupts patches invisibly > > and without being noticed by the author, and also since quite some of my > > own patches got affected by that bug, i would like to ask to raise the > > priority of this one. > > > > BEWARE: > > everyone, who was working on patches in 0.42.X, that contain > > abstractions containing [declare]'s is most likely affected, or i should > > rather say: infected. > > > > read the description here: > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2251387&group_id=55736&atid=478070 > > > > roman > > > > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > > Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pd-dev mailing list > > Pd-dev@iem.at > > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > Pd-dev@iem.at > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
