Oops... I'd better fix that one.

I'm still not sure how to deal with "declares" inside abstractions, on
the other hand.

cheers
Miller

On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 05:39:34PM -0800, Luke Iannini wrote:
> Yo, I've been meaning to mention forever that there's a similar issue
> with datastructures.  Save a datastructure-using patch as an
> abstraction, instantiate it in a parent patch, save the parent, and
> you'll see template definitions from the child abstraction in the
> parent.  I'll make another bug report for that...
> 
> Best
> Luke
> 
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Roman Haefeli <reduzie...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> > hi everyone
> >
> > i once posted a bug to the tracker and it still appears to be there in
> > version 0.42.3.
> >
> > since this bug is kind of viral, so that it corrupts patches invisibly
> > and without being noticed by the author, and also since quite some of my
> > own patches got affected by that bug, i would like to ask to raise the
> > priority of this one.
> >
> > BEWARE:
> > everyone, who was working on patches in 0.42.X, that contain
> > abstractions containing [declare]'s is most likely affected, or i should
> > rather say: infected.
> >
> > read the description here:
> > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2251387&group_id=55736&atid=478070
> >
> > roman
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ___________________________________________________________
> > Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-dev mailing list
> > Pd-dev@iem.at
> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev@iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev

_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev

Reply via email to