Hallo, IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > Frank Barknecht wrote: > >How does minimizing the number of "loaded libraries" affect the goal of > >storing preferences in patches? > > depends on what you mean by "storing the preferences in patches". > one part of the preferences is the libraries to be loaded. > personally, i think it is a good thing to explicitely require libraries > in patches that need them.
Yeah, but IMO one has nothing to do with the other. Just because a pd-extended user would be forced to manage preferences manually doesn't make [import] a builtin or makes everyone layout their patches and externals as Pd-extended does it neither lets it [declare] work in abstractions. So I don't see how a minimized set of libraries affects anything. Personally I don't care what pd-extended loads and what not, but *if* minimizing libraries should be done, then I think no library should be loaded at all besides [import]. Ciao -- Frank _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
