On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 11:24 +0100, marius schebella wrote:
> hey hans,
>
> if it's called "extended" and you strip it down to the bare bones,
> then where's the extended part?
i think, noone wanted to strip down anything. this is only about not
loading the whole bunch of libs automatically anymore. how does that
make pd-extended less 'extended'?
> eventually, I think users should not have to bother with namespaces at
> all. I still consider namespace declarations in a visual dataflow
> programming tool to be a hack.
can you elaborate that a bit? to me it looks perfectly normal, that i
have to at least call the tools, that i am going to use.
roman
___________________________________________________________
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
