On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Aug 17, 2009, at 4:33 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
A big problem with the tooltips, is that t_inlets aren't made into classes
the same way the t_objects are: most of the time, for a class of t_object,
there are no custom t_inlet classes, and instead one of the four basic
t_inlet classes are used. It makes the tooltip information shared for the
first inlet and non-shared for the rest. this is an irregularity that has
to be addressed somehow...
Ok, I miss remembered. It seems the original implementation attached the
text to the t_inlet, and t_class was suggested as the preferred struct for
that info. It looks like Chris switched the implementation to use t_class.
If you read what I wrote at first, you'd realise that the original
implementation didn't use only t_inlet, and that Chris didn't change that.
I started a dev wiki page to keep track of the info, please expand on
this.
I already expanded on it on the pd-dev mailing-list today. Perhaps it will
be read by someone someday... Frankly, if you don't read it on pd-dev, you
won't read it on your wiki either.
Like was mentioned at PdCon, this could be something like a Python PEP,
or feature proposal.
If the PEP thing was only "mentioned" at PdCon, then it's not gonna
happen.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal, Québec
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
