On Sep 22, 2009, at 1:04 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
i agree (and honestly i don't think a CPAN-like system will happen
anytime soon).
It will happen as soon as someone does it. :D I don't think
anyone objects to the idea, right?
well, like always - i do :-)
i agree with dmotd, that such a thing has to be thought through
_very_ carefully. it's easy to hack together something dirty.
e.g. cygwins package management system is just something i would
never ever like to encounter again.
but honestly: personally as a debian user (being nurtured with apt)
i am not a great friend of all these concurrent packaging systems;
e.g. python-eggs/buildouts do cause me a lot of headache, because
they don't integrate into apt (or any other concurrent package-
manager, i guess) at all. i don't want to get Pd into the same
hell....
Well, not everyone in the world uses Debian.... whether or not they
should is a different question. Things like CPAN quite possibly
predate debian, since we would be starting post-Debian, we could just
use Debian packages internally for Pd.
.hc
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is
related to the telescope. -Edsger Dykstra
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev