Patches item #3032844, was opened at 2010-07-21 16:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by millerpuckette You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3032844&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: puredata Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: ClaudiusMaximus (claudiusmaximus) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Sort method tables by symbol and use binary search Initial Comment: Sort method tables by symbol and use O(log(N)) binary search instead of an O(N) linear search. This should speed up calling existing methods but it might slow down adding new methods. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Miller Puckette (millerpuckette) Date: 2010-08-17 20:50 Message: I once profiled Pd loading a large patch and found that a tiny percentage of the CPU time spent was method searching... are there situations where this makes an important difference? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3032844&group_id=55736 _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
