What happens if it stays where it is? Does Sourceforge complain? Debian? Will it be detrimental to people's projects that use Pd? Will it impede Pd's development?
-Jonathan --- On Wed, 12/8/10, Hans-Christoph Steiner <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Hans-Christoph Steiner <[email protected]> > Subject: [PD-dev] removing non-free code from pure-data SVN > To: "pd-dev List" <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2010, 9:10 PM > > So we now have two non-free libraries included in the > pure-data SVN: pidip and unauthorized. As far as I > understand it, this is in violation of what SourceForge asks > of projects, and also seems to me in violation of the > developers on the pure-data SourceForge, since the rest of > the code there uses free licenses (mostly GPL, BSD-like, and > Tcl-like). > > So the question is: should we remove pidip and unauthorized > from the pure-data SVN? > > .hc > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > News is what people want to keep hidden and everything else > is publicity. - Bill > Moyers > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev > _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
