On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 08:52 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2010-12-13 23:15, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 14:42 -0500, Martin wrote: > >> What? It's better to crash the server than to disconnect an unresponsive > >> client? > > > > Why crashing the server? I don't get the alarmism. If a patch needs to > > i think martin commented on my "if you rather go and crash or > whatever...it's up to you." > > and yes, i do think that if i as a patcher decide that it is the proper > response to an unresponsive client to fill up the buffer until the > server crashes, than i should be able to do this.
It seems that I sidetracked this conversation with my comment that was meant more as a "hmm, this might end up being problematic because its unusual" than arguing against the approach. "Whatever works" is the key, IMHO. .hc _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
