Hey Ricardo,
It really needs to be on a library-by-library basis, since there are
so many different libraries maintained by many different people.
There are two good ways for finding who the maintainer is of a given
library:
Check who has committed to the library:
cd externals/iemlib
svn log |head -5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r15146 | tmusil | 2011-07-07 14:43:33 -0400 (Thu, 07 Jul 2011) | 1 line
Then email that person and the pd-dev list, you can just add
@users.sourceforge.net to the sourceforge username for their email.
Or you can check the Pd-extended maintainer:
https://puredata.info/docs/LibrariesInPdExtended
The closest thing to a blanket authorization that anyone has is
Jonathan Wilkes has gotten permission basically everywhere to add the
[pd META] subpatches to all the help patches.
.hc
On Oct 25, 2011, at 6:26 PM, Ricardo Fabbri wrote:
Hans,
Starting off the week on Pd. To begin with, do I have your consent to
routinely commit small fixes to Pd documentation and code
documentation in the SVN community repo, even outside pix_opencv and
pdp_opencv? Do I need to forward you my commits or use the patch
tracker for details like that?
Thanks.
Ricardo Fabbri
--
Linux registered user #175401
labmacambira.sf.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mistrust authority - promote decentralization. - the hacker ethic
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
