I Apbert - I don't think it affects font style (oldness or font face itself) but just gets the sizes to be closer to 0.42.
I think that if you're on a macintosh, font was boldface in 0.42 and isn't (by default) on 0.43. On linux I don't think that changed from 0.42 to 0.43. cheers Miller On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 07:16:44AM +0100, Albert Graef wrote: > On 01/15/2012 05:34 AM, Miller Puckette wrote: > >I noticed font sizes changed from 0.42 to 0.43 and tried to tweak them > >back to 0.42-style, by having the new font-size-search code in > >pd-gui.c actually try to find the font sizes that s_main.c later searches > >(redundantly) for. I should have done this earlier. If this doesn't > >break anything it migth be worth rolling out a 0.43-2 just so people don't > >spend all next year with incorrect font sizes...? > > I must say that I much prefer the looks of 0.43-1. Maybe it's just > because I got used to it, but the 0.42'ish fonts look too bold to me > now. Does this change really have a big impact on patch layout? I > didn't notice any for the patches that I tried. > > Albert > > -- > Dr. Albert Gr"af > Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany > Email: [email protected], [email protected] > WWW: http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
