Bugs item #3484412, was opened at 2012-02-04 11:02
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by eighthave
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=3484412&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: puredata
Group: v0.43
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: some patches w/ subpatches cause Tcl stacktrace
Initial Comment:
In Pd-extended 0.43.1-20120204 on Mac OS X 10.6.8/Intel 32-bit, the Gem
pix-video-help.pd patch triggers a Tcl stacktrace when you click on the
[create( message in the lower right corner, which goes into a subpatch to
create the gemwin. Here's the stacktrace:
(Tcl) INVALID COMMAND NAME: invalid command name ".x259030.c"
while executing
".x259030.c delete 10ce200BASE0"
("uplevel" body line 44)
invoked from within
"uplevel #0 $cmds_from_pd"
This stacktrace says that .x259030.c does not exist, which is true. If you open
the [pd properties] subpatch in the center of the pix_video-help.pd patch, then
.x259030.c will exist. The command from the stacktrace, ".x259030.c delete
10ce200BASE0", deletes the original 1-unit hradio, which is then redrawn into
more, based on how many properties of the camera they are. That logic is in a
subpatch in [pd properties] called [pd PropertyLogic].
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=3484412&group_id=55736
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
