Yes, I object. Like I said in the bug tracker and this thread, I think the offset should either remain the same or be the same as the rest.
.hc On 02/28/2012 04:45 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > trying to take the heat out of this: > > my patch suggested to change the loglevel offset from "+4" to "+3". > is there anything speaking against this specific change? > > > (it seems that all discussion is centered around the question whether > there should be an offset at all, rather than how big it should be) > > fgmasdr > IOhannes > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > Pd-dev@iem.at > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
