On 10/20/2012 01:26 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I'm not going to take on the maintenance of those patches, so just copying
them into Pd-extended is not an option. I'm think Pd-extended should have an
'oscx' compatible library , and 'oscx' is already there, tested, etc.
"etc" means "known to be buggy & unmaintained".
i'm not arguing against OSCx because of it's architectural flaws but
because it's not working as it should.
mfgdsrt
IOhannes
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
