> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoel...@iem.at>
>> To: pd-dev@iem.at
>> Cc: 
>> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 10:51 AM
>> Subject: Re: [PD-dev] help patch bug reports
>> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> On 2012-12-20 15:27, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>> 
>>>   Hey Jonathan,
>>> 
>>>   I'm guessing that you're the one filing all the bug reports 
> about
>>>   help patches.  I'm wondering what your goal is with filing them.
>>>   It seems that you're also committing stuff to the same help
>>>   patches?
>>> 
>> 
>> of course i cannot speak for jonathan, but it seems like the
>> help-patch edits remove the "TODO" found in [pd META] - as these 
> TODOs
>> are now tracked in the bugreport tickets: "moved doc errors from META
>> subpatch to svn tracker"
>> 
>> actually i think having these tickets in the sf-tracker is a good idea.
> 
> You are correct.  Most of the commits were simply as stated.  Some of the
> META comments didn't apply anymore so I removed those without adding
> to the tracker.  Everything added to the tracker should be current help patch
> bugs which may be:
> 
> * missing example patch
> * missing description of the object
> * failing to explain what an xlet does
> * broken connections
> * some or all of the above
> 
> Doing this makes the search results with the gui-plugin "prettier" and 
> centralizes
> all bugs to the tracker.
> 
> -Jonathan

That makes sense, just wondering what the idea was.

.hc



_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev

Reply via email to