> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoel...@iem.at> >> To: pd-dev@iem.at >> Cc: >> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 10:51 AM >> Subject: Re: [PD-dev] help patch bug reports >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 2012-12-20 15:27, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >>> >>> Hey Jonathan, >>> >>> I'm guessing that you're the one filing all the bug reports > about >>> help patches. I'm wondering what your goal is with filing them. >>> It seems that you're also committing stuff to the same help >>> patches? >>> >> >> of course i cannot speak for jonathan, but it seems like the >> help-patch edits remove the "TODO" found in [pd META] - as these > TODOs >> are now tracked in the bugreport tickets: "moved doc errors from META >> subpatch to svn tracker" >> >> actually i think having these tickets in the sf-tracker is a good idea. > > You are correct. Most of the commits were simply as stated. Some of the > META comments didn't apply anymore so I removed those without adding > to the tracker. Everything added to the tracker should be current help patch > bugs which may be: > > * missing example patch > * missing description of the object > * failing to explain what an xlet does > * broken connections > * some or all of the above > > Doing this makes the search results with the gui-plugin "prettier" and > centralizes > all bugs to the tracker. > > -Jonathan
That makes sense, just wondering what the idea was. .hc _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev