On 08/13/13 23:39, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > > Ideally, the pd-extended build system would name the executable properly, but > it currently does the wrong thing. For the packaging, I think the best thing > to do right now is to use a debian/install file to install the file as > usr/bin/pd-extended. I think the line in debian/install would look like this: > > usr/bin/pd usr/bin/pd-extended
this unfortunately does not work. you will end up with a file `/usr/bin/pd-extended/pd` the way it is handled in the `puredata` package is by using the standard configure option `--program-transform-name='s/pd$$/puredata/` another way would be to override the dh_auto_build target and do the renaming there. a totally untested snippet: <snip> override_dh_auto_build: dh_auto_build cp bin/pd bin/pd-extended </snip> > > As for basing the pd-extended package off of the 'puredata' package, I think > that is not a good idea. The pd-extended package will generate a single > package called pd-extended. The puredata package generates lots of sub > packages [...] ah yes, i was really mainly referring to `debian/rules` fgmsdr IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
