On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 11:18 +0800, Chris McCormick wrote: > Hi Brian, > > On 07/03/14 08:22, Brian Fay wrote: > > Does anybody know if sample-accurate [metros] are available in libpd? > > Looking at x_time.c in libpd it does not seem like those changes from > Miller's branch have been merged into libpd yet. I am sure somebody will > get to it soon, or you could do it yourself and submit a patch.
I believe we're discussing to separate things, that don't necessarily relate to each other. One topic is [metro]'s precision. It has been sub-sample precise at least since I started understanding the concept (~ 0.40). So I think it is very likely the [metro] in libpd is precise as well (though I haven't used libpd myself and cannot test). Then there have been a lot of methods added to [metro] in Pd 0.45. Those just make it simpler to use it and save the user to do timing calculations on her/his own. They are just a convenience, but don't affect [metro]'s precision. Roman _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev