There's a new object named text with most of its source in x_text.c.

The stuff relating to data structures is probably in g_template.c but I haven't 
looked yet.

-Jonnathan



On Sunday, September 14, 2014 4:11 PM, Ivica Bukvic <[email protected]> wrote:
 


If there a specific object name so that we can grep the source?
On Sep 14, 2014 3:26 PM, "Jonathan Wilkes" <[email protected]> wrote:

He's probably talking about Miller's new struct field for text, which AFAICT 
stores a binbuf as scalar data.
>
>
>-Jonathan
>
>
>
>
>On Sunday, September 14, 2014 1:58 PM, Ivica Bukvic <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>
>
>We will merge 0.45+ objects in the upcoming releases. If you can list what 
>exactly they are that will greatly help in the process. The latency in their 
>adoption is primarily to allow for them to be fully vetted for possible bugs 
>and regressions.
>
>
>Regarding storing text in a datastructure, I am not sure what that exactly 
>means but I do use extensively something that may be similar, namely coll 
>object from the cyclone library, which allows for a comprehensive storing, 
>sorting, and recalling of data.
>
>
>As for running pd-l2ork on other platfroms, until we complete the qt port, 
>there is as of yet unadvertised USB stick version you can download from 
>L2Ork's site (see http://l2ork.music.vt.edu/data/pd/ and look for a jumbo 6GB 
>image--pd-l2ork would need to be updated to the latest version) that I tested 
>with a reasonably large number of windows and OSX laptops with 90%+ success 
>rate, with only select Dell and OSX machines refusing to boot it due to faulty 
>EFI (whether intentional or unintentional), and some of the wifi cards not 
>being supported out-of-box.
>
>
>HTH
>
>
>
>
>On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Colet Patrice <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Le 13/09/2014 23:37, Ivica Ico Bukvic a écrit :
>>
>>
>>>On 9/13/2014 5:10 PM, Colet Patrice wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I don't know the implications of introducing some wizard that rewrite code 
>>>>into patches for backward compatibility,
>>>>but the idea looks seducing for me because it might break inertia that 
>>>>makes the GUI still looking like patching in the nineties.
>>>>
>>>>Sorry for the cynicism but it's truely a joke we sometimes share when it's 
>>>>about pd interface.
>>>>
>>>>
If you would like to contribute to "upgrading" the UI to something more 
contemporary, we could always use more help on pd-l2ork side of things where 
the canvas currently uses SVG for drawing all contents (see 
http://l2ork.music.vt.edu/main/?page_id=2554 for more info). More so, we are 
currently starting to port entire gui to qt library which should make things 
considerably more flexible/efficient...
>>>
>>>
>> I'm allready using pd-l2ork on my linux boxes when I don't use stuff we can 
>> only find in pd-0.45 and greater,
>>particulary the ability of storing text in datastructure, and when I don't 
>>have to rewrite an install script.
>> I'm even advising any new comer using GNU/Linux to use l2ork before he is 
>> disgusted by the old interface,
>>but they are a few, almost all people I know (and sometimes work with) that 
>>would use pd have OSX or Windows and have no clue about how to install l2ork.
>>
>>This imply a very tiny collaborative field, which doesn't sound really 
>>reassuring, even if on screenshots this looks great.
>>Anyway, the use of qt looks promising and might give to me the opportunity of 
>>upgrading my pianoroll interface.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>patco
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Best,
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Pd-dev mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev

Reply via email to