Cool - this would be a good conference paper somewhere, maybe LAC... But maybe it would be easier for you if I simply ask you specific qestions when I don't understand something in the diffs...
Not sure when I'll realy get to work on this - I'm also hoping to put in a proper multiple-undo facility (borrowing from Ico) and am toying with the idea of making it easier to bundle patches and their support files together somehow (so that you can distribute a patch that would have its own abstractions/samples/whatever bundled in). cheers Miller On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 12:11:10AM +0100, katja wrote: > Miller, I still have 100+ pages of (handwritten, Dutch) notes on > Pd-double. If you're serious about making precision-related > modifications to vanilla Pd I'll start re-reading these notes because > it's a while ago and not all issues were trivial or self-evident. The > page www.katjaas.nl/doubleprecision/doubleprecision.html doesn't > document the implementation details. > > Katja > > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 7:37 PM, Miller Puckette <[email protected]> wrote: > > The diffs are helpful - I would probably want to go and re-do all the > > edits by hand to be sure I understand everything. A couple of things > > probably will need tweaking to get it all up to date too. > > > ... > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
