On 09/26/2015 12:44 PM, Chris McCormick wrote: > On 25/09/15 23:04, Miller Puckette wrote: >> I'd like to get a better understanding of all this n part because I'd >> like >> to incorporate deken into Pd vanilla assuming its developers are cool >> with >> that. > > I don't know about IOhannes [who at this point has probably contributed > more lines of code than me to deken] but I am definitely cool with that. >
i think it's great. i think there are still a few issues open that should be fixed before integrating the code¹ > If this happened it would probably make sense to split the tcl plugin > out to go into Pd vanilla and keep the deken packaging script as a > separate project. i don't think that the packaging script should be part of Pd. gfmdsa IOhannes ¹ and then there is dekenception: it would be way easier to implement it if deken was included in Pd; but i doubt whether it would be accepted... ...but then i don't even know whether it makes sense
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
