I see you found my question, thanks for your responses.
Here is the error I get when DEFDACBLKSIZE is 8 and DEFSENDVS is 64 : error:
throw~ out: vector size mismatch
I was getting similar errors when using [s~] [r~] or [catch~].
>also, the overhead with a blocksize of 8 is considerably higher than a
>blocksize of 64, so when using *heavy* Pd-patches you might hit
>performance problems sooner than later.
Where is the performance hit for DEFDACBLKSIZE = 8 ?I see how there could be a
performance hit when using a smaller audio driver block size, but would there
be much difference between, e.g. DEFDACBLKSIZE = 8 and DEFDACBLKSIZE = 64 if
the audio driver block size is set to 64 in both cases?
Thanks,Giulio
From: IOhannes m zmoelnig <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, 12 July 2016, 8:46
Subject: Re: [PD-dev] DEFDACBLKSIZE and DEFSENDVS
On 2016-07-12 04:51, Giulio Moro via Pd-dev wrote:
> My original question was also about why it is defined in multiple places and
> why DEFSENDVS is defined separately, yet setting them to two different values
> gives errors.
was it? i don't see this question in your original mail.
also: what is the error you get?
fgamsdr
IOhannes
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
