Seems to work in libpd_init(). Thanks

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
> On Sep 24, 2016, at 11:35 AM, Dan Wilcox <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Thanks. Good catch! I’ll try it now.
> 
> --------
> Dan Wilcox
> @danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika>
> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
>> On Sep 24, 2016, at 11:34 AM, Pierre Guillot <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Dan, 
>> I think I had the same issue with my plugin and PD 0.47. If I remember well, 
>> the solution was to call "sys_startgui(NULL)" after "pd_init()" (it should 
>> be in libpd_init() I think).
>> 
>> 2016-09-24 19:26 GMT+02:00 Dan Wilcox <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>> Digging further, looks like sys_zoomfontwidth() & sys_zoomfontheight() are 
>> returning 0 in glist_fontwith()/glist_fontheight().
>> 
>> --------
>> Dan Wilcox
>> @danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika>
>> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
>> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
>>> On Sep 24, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Dan Wilcox <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I’m playing with removing the @synchronized locks in the libpd Obj-C layer 
>>> since the updates to the libpd ringbuffer seem to be working now.
>>> 
>>> Long story short, I’m only running into one issue: divide by 0s in 
>>> g_rtext.c rtext_senditup() when opening a file. It seems that the findx & 
>>> findy computations on line 215 & 216 fails since the previous 
>>> glist_fontwidth() & glist_fontheight() calls return 0. Could this be an 
>>> execution order issue where removing the lock is making something happen 
>>> earlier than it should?
>>> 
>>> Adding the following before the findx & findy math works as a quick fix to 
>>> keep the divide by zero error:
>>> 
>>> if (fontwidth <= 0) fontwidth = 1;
>>> if (fontheight <= 0) fontheight = 1;
>>> 
>>> I’m wondering if there is a better way to catch this...
>>> 
>>> --------
>>> Dan Wilcox
>>> @danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika>
>>> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
>>> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-dev mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev 
>> <https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev>
>> 
>> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev

Reply via email to