Sure enough.  Fixed in git repo now.

thanks
Miller

On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 02:53:18PM +0100, Nicolas Danet wrote:
> Hello, 
> 
> Is the code above good < 
> https://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/pure-data/ci/master/tree/src/d_arithmetic.c#l454
>  >? 
> 
> over_perform / d_arithmetic.c / line 1454
> 
> ...
> 
> t_sample g = *in2++;
> *out++ = (g ? *in1++ / g : 0);
> 
> ...
> 
> AFAIK the in1 pointer is not incremented if the content of in2 is zero.
> 
> Whereas the over_perf8 method increments it. So i guess that there is 
> something wrong.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev

_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev

Reply via email to