Here is the fully automated patch. Hope it helps.
Test_Patch_Automated.pd
Description: Binary data
> On 11 Apr 2017, at 10:39, IOhannes m zmoelnig <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2017-04-11 11:30, Niccolò Granieri wrote: >> - I'm attaching the minimal test patch with which I was able to reproduce >> the bug. > > thanks. > however, that test patch doesn't do anything (yet). > > could you make the TestPatch complete, so that it: > - can be run as a standalone? (e.g. it includes a *sender* of OSC data) > - sets up the system so that it can exhibit the problem, or at least > provide step-by-step instructions on how to trigger the problem. > > something as trivial as: > 1. click here > 2. notice that the number over there changes > 3. now turn on the DSP > 4. click here again > 5. notice that the number doesn't change > 6. turn DSP off > 7. notice how the number changes again > > ideally most of these steps should be automated (apart from the "notice" > part, which probably requires a human) > > i have a number of bug-patches lying on my harddisk. if they are not > self-describing they are pretty worthless. > > fgamsf > IOhannes > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
