> Just a wild guess: It looks like your localhost connection is slow for > some reason. Is there some anti virus software installed? If so, does > the problem still occur when anti virus is stopped?
No antivirus installed on my Mac. Also, I can assure you that it's not a slow localhost problem. It's happening also on another Mac, and a Lenovo running Linux. It's an issue that Pd has when it receives a big stream of OSC data. > On 12 Apr 2017, at 16:06, Roman Haefeli <[email protected]> wrote: > > Just a wild guess: It looks like your localhost connection is slow for > some reason. Is there some anti virus software installed? If so, does > the problem still occur when anti virus is stopped? > > Roman > > On Mit, 2017-04-12 at 16:02 +0100, Niccolò Granieri wrote: >>> >>> Does the attached modified version of your test patch still exhibit >>> the >>> problem? >> >> Yes, same exact problem. >> >>> >>> On 12 Apr 2017, at 16:01, Roman Haefeli <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Does the attached modified version of your test patch still exhibit >>> the >>> problem? >>> >>> Roman >>> >>> On Mit, 2017-04-12 at 13:02 +0100, Niccolò Granieri wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I cannot with the same Pd version on Linux. I wonder whether it >>>>> is >>>>> related to the high refresh rate of the number boxes. >>>>> >>>>> Does the GUI freeze still occur if the the update rate of the >>>>> number >>>>> boxes (not that of actual data going through the wire!) is >>>>> throttled? >>>> Hi Roman, I'm not quite sure how I would throttle the number >>>> boxes, >>>> can you be more specific? >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Is wish more likely the bottleneck on some platforms, but not >>>>> on >>>>> others? Is wish using 100% of a CPU core when the freeze >>>>> happens? >>>> Actually Pd drops in CPU usage after the freeze happens. From 40% >>>> to >>>> 0,8%. But the GUI is completetly frozen and the audio has up to a >>>> 5second delay! >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pd-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 12 Apr 2017, at 12:55, Roman Haefeli <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Die, 2017-04-11 at 18:33 +0200, Damian Stewart wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Fwiw I can reproduce exactly the behaviour that Niccolò is >>>>>> seeing >>>>>> here. OSX 10.12.3, pd vanilla 0.47.1 64 bit. >>>>> I cannot with the same Pd version on Linux. I wonder whether it >>>>> is >>>>> related to the high refresh rate of the number boxes. >>>>> >>>>> Does the GUI freeze still occur if the the update rate of the >>>>> number >>>>> boxes (not that of actual data going through the wire!) is >>>>> throttled? >>>>> >>>>> Is wish more likely the bottleneck on some platforms, but not >>>>> on >>>>> others? Is wish using 100% of a CPU core when the freeze >>>>> happens? >>>>> >>>>> (Sorry if I'm repeating what IOhannes already said) >>>>> >>>>> Roman >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> p.s.: Why is this on pd-dev? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 11 Apr 2017, at 00:56, Niccolò Granieri >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello Pd-dev mailing list, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am writing, for the first time, to point out an issue I'm >>>>>>> having >>>>>>> with incoming OSC data in Pd and DSP being turned on. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The problem occurs when, while receiving OSC data from >>>>>>> inside >>>>>>> my >>>>>>> machine (thus using a localhost), I turn on DSP. The OSC >>>>>>> data >>>>>>> stops >>>>>>> flowing until I don't turn the DSP off. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The only workaround I found to solve this issue is to run >>>>>>> two >>>>>>> separate instances of Pd: the first one that will act as an >>>>>>> OSC >>>>>>> parser, not having the need to turn on DSP. Once the data >>>>>>> is >>>>>>> parsed, the data is sent to a second instance of Pd via >>>>>>> FUDI >>>>>>> protocol (netsend) where it can coexist with DSP on without >>>>>>> causing >>>>>>> any issues. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This unfortunately brings up the amount of computing power >>>>>>> needed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I was wondering if anyone encountered the same problem >>>>>>> before, >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> if there was any better solution. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks in advance, glad to be in this mailing list, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Niccolò >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Pure Data 0.47.1 - 64 bit >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Pd-dev mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Pd-dev mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pd-dev mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev >>> <Test_Patch_Automated_throttled.pd> > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
