The build issue is fixed and libpd is now using pd 0.48-0. No official release 
yet, but you can try the current master branch.

> On Aug 14, 2017, at 6:59 PM, Alex <x37v.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Ahh, okay.
> Maybe I'll see about running libpd with a slightly older pure-data source 
> submodule.. 
> Thanks for the heads up!
> -Alex
> 
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Dan Wilcox <danomat...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:danomat...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Note: There is currently an issue with the pd sources and libpd: 
> https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/180 
> <https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/180>
> 
>> On Aug 14, 2017, at 12:52 PM, Dan Wilcox <danomat...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:danomat...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Also, the current pd sources are not up to date with the 0.48 release. I 
>> will do that for now at least.
> 
> --------
> Dan Wilcox
> @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
> 
> 
> 
> 

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>



_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@lists.iem.at
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev

Reply via email to