[declare -lib jit_expr] worked on my osx machine. On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:27 AM, Lucas Cordiviola <lucard...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Can you try on you osx [declare -lib jit_expr] or [declare -lib > full/path/to/jit_expr]? > > I'm not sure if -stdlib is currently covering the > .../documents/pd/externals/* on all platforms. > > see https://puredata.info/docs/faq/how-do-i-install- > externals-and-help-files for the paths that -stdlib covers. > > there's a discussion here : https://github.com/pure-data/ > pure-data/pull/205 > > --- > > I think there will be no name clashes if you keep your [jit_expr] naming. > If you use [expr] it will clash with Pd's [expr]. > > > > -- > > Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas. > > On 2/21/2018 1:50 PM, Alex wrote: > > I have an external I've created that I've put into: > /Users/alex/Documents/Pd/externals/jit_expr/ > the binary is called "jit_expr.pd_darwin" > > xnor-work:~/projects/perfect/center$ ls /Users/alex/Documents/Pd/ > externals/jit_expr/ > LICENSE-parser LICENSE-pd LICENSE-xnor > jit_expr-help.pd jit_expr.pd_darwin > > In the binary, the externals themselves are named "jit/expr" "jit/expr~" > and "jit/fexpr~" > > On my work, osX machine, when I [declare -stdlib jit_expr] I then fail to > create [jit/expr] > On my home, linux machine, where my external folder is located at > /home/alex/.local/lib/pd/externals/jit_expr and appropriately named > jit_expr.pd_linux > I succeed to create [jit/expr] after [declare -stdlib jit_expr] > > Is this a bug am I not following some naming convention that I should be? > > I could see wanting to put my external in a folder called "jit" and then > naming them "expr", "expr~" etc but I could imagine "jit" is more likely to > collide and so "jit_expr" seemed more reasonable. > maybe I should just call the whole thing "jit_expr", and just call the > objects "expr" etc without the prefix in the code and then be able to > create [jit_expr/expr] with no declare because it'll be in the stdlib > already? > Am I confusing conventions that exist for single binary libraries with > multiple objects and binaries with only one? > > Either way, should I file a bug that the behavior isn't the same on osx > and linux? > > thanks, > Alex > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing > listpd-...@lists.iem.athttps://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev > > >
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev