Also, if you're targeting C++11, I think you'll have to use a min of at least 10.7 (from https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7482026/can-i-use-the-latest-features-of-c11-in-xcode-4-or-osx-lion <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7482026/can-i-use-the-latest-features-of-c11-in-xcode-4-or-osx-lion>).
One thing we've noticed is that Pd builds on my machine running 10.13 don't seems to work on 10.6-10.7 systems, so the deployment target is really a suggestion at best. You'll have to do some testing but it's hard to hit *everyone* and honestly the vast majority of users fall within the newest to maybe 3 versions before anyway (ie. 10.10 - 10.13 now). For plain C/C++, you can have a relatively old deployment target. It's really more important for macOS app development using the Apple frameworks ie. stuff like the changes from QT to AVFoundation, etc. > On Mar 19, 2018, at 10:07 PM, Dan Wilcox <danomat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The compiler builds for the current system by default. You have to set the > min deployment target when building. > > Add this flag to you makefile: --mmacosx-version-min=10.6 > > The current version for Pd is 10.6 which is the first version that supported > i386 (ie. Intel processors). > >> On Mar 19, 2018, at 12:00 PM, pd-dev-requ...@lists.iem.at >> <mailto:pd-dev-requ...@lists.iem.at> wrote: >> >> From: Miller Puckette <m...@ucsd.edu <mailto:m...@ucsd.edu>> >> To: Alex <x37v.a...@gmail.com <mailto:x37v.a...@gmail.com>> >> Cc: pd-dev <pd-dev@lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-dev@lists.iem.at>> >> Subject: Re: [PD-dev] Mac SDK version for externals >> Message-ID: <20180319015755.GY7620@elroy.localdomain >> <mailto:20180319015755.GY7620@elroy.localdomain>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >> >> This is a very interesting and useful question. >> >> At the outset of PD I only worried about having it run on the "current" >> platforms: Redhat 5.2, Windows 95, and when it arrived, MacOS 10.2. Older >> platforms weren't important. >> >> Since then I've tried to keep back compatibility to whatever those >> bleeding-edge >> OSes were, because I assume people can't always afford machine upgrades. But >> I haven't tried to extend Pd (Or "extra" objects) backward past the original >> dates. >> >> At the moment I can only compile back to OSX 10.5 (PPC) and Windows XP; I >> don't have real or virtual machines that go back further. >> >> So my suggestion would be: make it work on today's OSes, and try to keep it >> alive on them, but don't worry too hard about older ones. I don't think I'm >> ever going to be tempted to compile Pd for Windows 3.1. >> >> cheers >> Miller > > -------- > Dan Wilcox > @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika> > danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> > robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/> > > > -------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
