On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 2:09 AM João Pais <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I do realize GEM is a possibility but, so many people seem to have trouble >> getting it working that it is tough to want to build new dependencies on >> GEM. >> It does turn out that I am actually converting the data from the >> datastructures into tables that I read into named arrays that I can read >> with [tabread~] though I am still using [get]... good though there on using >> [array get] ! >> > > not sure if gem is so problematic (I only use it sporadically) - there was > a compatibility issue with 32b build on windows (which can kind of be > solved), but maybe I'm not following what happens on other OSs. > If you need to interact with scalars, then data-s would be helpful. > Sometimes some bugs in tcl/tk happen, and pd has to be restarted. > > (I have here a patch with more than 33548 scalars, and that window does > take lots of time to open.) > Yeah.. my patch does have some issues locking up PD at this time.. the datastuct is quite complex and if I have the drawing window open when I create the ds then pd hangs for quite a while.. though once I do the initial draw opening and closing the window is quick... I do wish I could have more capabilities for manipulating the visualization without actually changing any data (zoom) which is something that would be pretty trivial with GEM. -Alex > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
