I wasn't aware that was supported and we didn't remove any existing capability, as far as I know. Sending via [netreceive] with TCP works as before.
As Christof says, if there were obvious commits we can certainly (re_integrate them if they were lost along the line. > On Mar 28, 2020, at 12:00 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 22:35:08 -0700 > From: Miller Puckette <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PD-dev] no longer able to "send" to UDP -- correction > Message-ID: <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > correction: I forgot that Roman's netpd uses iemnet, not netsend/netreceive, > which I guess is why his jack~ implementation is working better than mine. > I can switch over as well, so I don't have any urgent need to send replies > from netreceive -u to netsend -u as I had thought. > > It would still be good if the new netsend/receive were able to do this, both > to maintain 0.50 compatibility, and to allow vanilla-only access to that > ability. -------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
