In Pd, signal inlets and outlets can share the same buffer. Therefore it
is important that for any given sample index you never write to any
outlet before reading from all inlets.
In your case, you have to first make a copy of all input signals before
passing them through to the outlets. You can allocate the necessary
intermediate buffers in the dsp() method.
I've been working with variable amounts of inlets and outlets
What do you mean by "variable" inlets/outlets? Do you mean that the
number of inlets/outlets is determined by creation arguments? In that
case, this is not related to the problem at ahdn. Buffer aliasing can
happen either way. (It actually depends on how the surrounding objects
are connected.)
Christof
On 31.05.2020 21:12, Eric Lennartson wrote:
I've been looking at the code for those, but I'm finding it a little
hard to parse.
Not sure how this is going to look on your end, but sorry for the text
wall. If there's a better way to share lmk.
typedefstruct_viotest
{
t_object x_obj;
int n_outs, n_ins, n_iolets;
t_sample**in_vec, **out_vec; // vector to hold all the inlets and outlets
} t_viotest_tilde;
staticvoidviotest_tilde_input(t_viotest_tilde*x, t_floatargf)
{
error("[viotest~]: no method for float.");
}
statict_int*viotest_tilde_perform(t_int*w)
{
t_viotest_tilde*x = (t_viotest_tilde*)(w[1]);
int nblock = (int)(w[2]);
int n = nblock;
t_sample **in_vec = x->in_vec;
t_sample **out_vec = x->out_vec;
int smaller = (x->n_ins < x-> n_outs) ? x->n_ins : x->n_outs;
for(int channel = 0; channel < smaller; ++channel)
{
t_sample* in = in_vec[channel];
t_sample* out = out_vec[channel];
n = nblock;
while(n--)
{
t_sample out_val = *in++;
*out++ = out_val;
}
}
return (w + 3);
}
staticvoidviotest_tilde_dsp(t_viotest_tilde*x, t_signal**sp)
{
int i, nblock = sp[0]->s_n;
t_sample **dummy = x->in_vec;
for(i = 0; i < x->n_ins; ++i)
{
*dummy++ = sp[i]->s_vec;
}
for(; i < x->n_iolets; ++i)
{
*dummy++ = sp[i]->s_vec;
}
dsp_add(viotest_tilde_perform, 2, x, nblock);
}
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 12:05 PM Alexandre Torres Porres
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I remember I went through similar stuff, see the code of else/mtx~
and cyclone/matrix~
and, share your code?
cheers
Em dom., 31 de mai. de 2020 às 16:00, Eric Lennartson
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> escreveu:
Hey all,
I've been working with variable amounts of inlets and outlets
and for the most part it's been working fine. If it's only
variable inlets and the outlets are fixed, or vice versa, it
works fine. However when both are variable I can't seem to get
the inlets to go to the correct outlet. My current code is
cycling through the inlets and outlets in pairs, but for some
reason this isn't working. Any thoughts?
Thanks
Eric
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
