Sorry, my fault I guess, i didn't test with -stderr... I can try to fix, but not before the end of the week.
Le lun. 23 août 2021 à 12:53, Christof Ressi <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hi, > > in this commit, "print_anything()" and "print_list()" now (ab)uses the new > "startlogpost()" function for printing individual pd atoms. However, for > "-stderr" and custom printhooks this will accidentally print "verbose(2) " > before each atom. > > I would suggest to add another function "logatom()" - analogous to > "postatom()" - which would only print the atom (without a newline) and omit > the "verbose(N) " header. > > Christof > On 23.08.2021 10:50, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > Hi > > Since f16dd5ec34 (I believe) everything printed to stderr is garbled. > For instance, when doing: > > [list a b 12( > | > [print] > > in 'pd -stderr', I get: > > ~~~ > verbose(2): print: listverbose(2): averbose(2): bverbose(2): 12 > ~~~ > > Without '-stderr', the print output looks fine in the Pd console. > > Roman > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing > [email protected]https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
