I presume there's a good reason to change the code (what if "long" is the wrong
size?) but I'd like to figure out a way to do it that doesn't throw warnings.
Ok, now I understand the reason for those few (unsigned long) casts.
It's because the printf() family functions will check the format
specifier, but the sys_vgui() function, which is used most of the time,
does not.
However, casting a pointer to (unsigned long) will give a warning on
64-bit Windows, so one of us will always get warnings either way :-)
See here for a discussion how to actually fix the problem:
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/1474
NOTE: although %p would be the obvious choice, we can't use it, because
the result is platform/compiler dependent. This is not a problem most of
the time but it can break in the case of a remote GUI! We really want
the pointer ID to look the same on all platforms!
Christof
On 03.12.2021 09:51, Albert Rafetseder wrote:
After merging commit c019784b83 (get rid of a 3 more bogus (unsigned long)
casts)
(Link to commit for reference: [0] )
I'm now getting compiler warnings like this:
g_editor.c:1884:73: warning: format ‘%lx’ expects argument of type ‘long
unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘struct _glist *’ [-Wformat=]
1884 | snprintf(cbuf, MAXPDSTRING - 2, "pdtk_canvas_setparents
.x%lx", c);
|
~~^ ~
|
| |
|
| struct _glist *
|
long unsigned int
..
I presume there's a good reason to change the code (what if "long" is the wrong
size?) but I'd like to figure out a way to do it that doesn't throw warnings.
My C has oxidized substantially over time, but I think the p conversion
specifier might be the correct thing to use -- if you can live with the
additional leading "0x" that is caused by its implied "alternate form"
flag, `#`.
From `man snprintf` on Linux / OS X:
"""
p The void * pointer argument is printed in hexadecimal (as if by
`%#x' or `%#lx').
"""
Trying with the current master [1] which includes the commit above, the
change from `%lx` to `%p` in lines 1884 and 1891 in `g_editor.c` fixes
the warning. (Other warnings/errors remain, and I wouldn't have a clue
what to test to check the outcome anyway.)
Best,
Albert.
[0]
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/commit/c019784b83f6638a1c4090ce27e6a0036b6bacaa
[1]
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/commit/364d859aa29c1d42be1d42ad81c74bc2fbc76cca
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@lists.iem.at
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@lists.iem.at
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
