On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 14:02 +0200, Dan Wilcox wrote: > > It was not a decision taken lightly,
That's what I thought. > but it's necessary as Pd's previous "error()" could conflict with > libc "error()". The replacement already existed for sometime, so > changing calls to "error(...)" with "pd_error(0, ...)" should be > equivalent and not break the external in old versions of Pd. So, if the pointer to the object (x) is not available, I can simply set it to 0 (or NULL)? Forgive my noobish question, but Pd doesn't crash when I call that function this way? Roman
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
