I guess I don't understand the meaning of 'regression' actually. Anyway, I see some of my help files updates were considering 0.53, like the unification of sliders, so yeah, even though there's not much new, there it is :)
Em dom., 16 de out. de 2022 às 13:47, Alexandre Torres Porres < [email protected]> escreveu: > What are the regressions? I could only see bug fixes. > > Em sáb., 15 de out. de 2022 às 17:01, IOhannes m zmölnig <[email protected]> > escreveu: > >> Am 14. Oktober 2022 18:13:00 MESZ schrieb Alexandre Torres Porres >> <[email protected]>: >> >Em sex., 14 de out. de 2022 às 12:12, IOhannes m zmölnig < >> [email protected]> >> >escreveu: >> > >> >> Am 14. Oktober 2022 15:32:42 MESZ schrieb Antoine Rousseau < >> >> [email protected]>: >> >> >has been made obsolete by the >> >> >recent rework of the interface to GUI >> >> >> >> Speaking of which: I think a bugfix release 0.52.3 should probably >> *not* >> >> contain the "rework of the interface to GUI", which is a rather big >> >> change... >> >> >> > >> >Why not? We're talking about things that had already been merged before, >> >> So what? >> >> i'm not really sure i understand what you mean exactly with "have been >> merged before". >> the fact that the PRs have already been merged into master? >> how is that related to "bugfix release"? >> >> >> >right? It seems to me most changes are "under the hood" and not proper >> new >> >features. >> >> >> And all of them include regressions. >> >> >> imho, a "bugfix release" is a promise to the user that says "nothing has >> changed with respect to the previous release, except we fixed these >> annoying bugs". >> so i worry not about "features" but about "anything not a bugfix". >> >> and with 0.52-3, plenty of things have changed (and a few annoying bugs >> have been fixed as well). >> ~70 C-files have been modified, and 3 header files have been modified >> (suggesting additions to the API) >> >> so i just fail to understand why we can't just call it "0.53-0", as this >> clearly is beyond a "bugfix" release. >> >> >> i'm probably highly influenced by semantic versioning [1], which is >> targetting versioning for libraries (API/ABI compatibility) rather than >> applications, but i think the model is so great that it can be applied >> to any software (that is not released very frequently). >> >> in any case: i'm not the one who is deciding on the versioning. >> >> >> gfmdsa >> IOhannes >> >> >> [1] https://semver.org/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Pd-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev >> >
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
